today's posted documents
- Asian Pacific Americans in the United States Congress -- Click to view this document
- Congressional Liaison Offices of Selected Federal Agencies -- Click to view this document
- House Committee Party Ratios: 98th-113th Congresses -- Click to view this document
- Financial Market Supervision: Canada's Perspective -- Click to view this document
- Sage Grouse and the Endangered Species Act (ESA) -- Click to view this document
- Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Discrimination in Employment: A Legal Analysis of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) -- Click to view this document
- The Workforce Investment Act and the One-Stop Delivery System -- Click to view this document
- EPA Regulations: Too Much, Too Little, or On Track? -- Click to view this document
- Keystone XL Pipeline Project: Key Issues -- Click to view this document
- Central America Regional Security Initiative: Background and Policy Issues for Congress -- Click to view this document
- State Taxation of Internet Transactions -- Click to view this document
- Federal Assistance for Wildfire Response and Recovery -- Click to view this document
- The U.S. Export Control System and the President's Reform Initiative -- Click to view this document
- DESIGNING A DIGITAL FUTURE: FEDERALLY FUNDED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN NETWORKING AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY -- Click to view this document
- Winning the Future With Science and Technology for 21st Century Smart Systems -- Click to view this document
For Power Users
FULL TEXT CRS DOCUMENTS
Find documents
The Endangered Species Act (ESA) and Claims of Property Rights "Takings"
The report then summarizes the court decisions on whether particular government actions (or inaction) based on the ESA "take" private property under the Fifth Amendment. The cases to date address several kinds of ESA impacts on private property: (1) restrictions on land uses that might adversely affect species listed as endangered or threatened, and mitigation conditions to offset the impacts of development; (2) administrative delays; (3) reductions in water delivery or allowable water diversion to preserve lake levels or instream flows needed by listed fish (currently the most active area of ESA takings litigation); (4) restrictions on the defensive measures a property owner may take to protect his/her property from listed animals; and (5) restrictions on commercial dealings in listed species. To date, only one of the 18 ESA-based takings cases disclosed by research, Tulare Lake Basin Water Storage District v. United States, has found a taking. However, two cases, Casitas Municipal Water District v. United States and Klamath Irrigation District v. United States, have yet to be finally resolved and may or may not result in holdings that takings occurred.
This package includes following files:
| # | File Name | Document Date | Order ID: | Number of Pages | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
RL31796.pdf
|
Jan 07, 2013 | RL31796 | 20 | $29.95 | Add to Cart |
Older Versions: