
today's posted documents
- Biological Opinions for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: A Case Law Summary -- Click to view this document
- The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility -- Click to view this document
- Border Security: Immigration Enforcement Between Ports of Entry -- Click to view this document
- Terrorist Watch List Screening and Background Checks for Firearms -- Click to view this document
- Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies (THUD): FY2013 Appropriations -- Click to view this document
- The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA): An Overview -- Click to view this document
- Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad, 1798-2013 -- Click to view this document
- Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund: Programs and Policy Issues -- Click to view this document
- Securing U.S. Diplomatic Facilities and Personnel Abroad: Background and Policy Issues -- Click to view this document
- Syria's Chemical Weapons: Issues for Congress -- Click to view this document
- Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues -- Click to view this document
- Terminating Contracts for the Government's Convenience: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions -- Click to view this document
- Selected Agency Budget Justifications for FY2014 -- Click to view this document
- The Enactment of Appropriations Measures During Lame Duck Sessions -- Click to view this document
- Missing Adults: Background, Federal Programs, and Issues for Congress -- Click to view this document
Find documents
The Hatch-Waxman Act: A Quarter Century Later
Industry support for pharmaceutical research and development has grown since the passage of the legislation although some recent figures indicate reduced R&D spending by several companies. In the absence of the research, development, and testing performed by the brand name pharmaceutical companies, generic drugs would not exist. The provisions of the Hatch-Waxman Act permit the generic industry to rely on information generated and financed by the brand name companies to obtain approval for their product by the FDA. However, the pharmaceutical industry today differs significantly from what it was in the early 1980s when the legislation was enacted. The cost of developing a drug has doubled, as has the number of clinical trials necessary to file a new drug application. The number of participants required for these trials has tripled. As the rate of return on investments in a new drug declined 12%, manufacturers often spend R&D dollars on developing improved versions of, or new delivery methods for an existing product. Many experts agree that the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act has had a significant effect on the availability of generic substitutes for brand name drugs. Yet, congressional concerns remain whether or not the balance inherent in the act remains appropriate over 25 years later.
This package includes following files:
| # | File Name | Document Date | Order ID: | Number of Pages | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
R41114.pdf
|
Dec 05, 2012 | R41114 | 17 | $29.95 | Add to Cart |
Older Versions:


R41114.pdf