
today's posted documents
- U.S.-Taiwan Relationship: Overview of Policy Issues -- Click to view this document
- The Lacey Act: Compliance Issues Related to Importing Plants and Plant Products -- Click to view this document
- Burma's Political Prisoners and U.S. Sanctions -- Click to view this document
- Energy and Water Development: FY2013 Appropriations -- Click to view this document
- Cybersecurity: Authoritative Reports and Resources -- Click to view this document
- Veterans' Medical Care: FY2013 Appropriations -- Click to view this document
- Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies: FY2013 Appropriations -- Click to view this document
- Table Egg Production and Hen Welfare: Agreement and Legislative Proposals -- Click to view this document
- Sugar Program: The Basics -- Click to view this document
- Positive Train Control (PTC): Overview and Policy Issues -- Click to view this document
- Letters and Diaries of Soldiers and Civilians -- Click to view this document
- Technology Horizons a Vision for Air Force Science and Technology 2010-30 -- Click to view this document
Find documents
Navy DDG-51 and DDG-1000 Destroyer Programs: Background and Issues for Congress
A Government Accountability Office (GAO) report released on January 24, 2012, discusses several potential oversight issues for Congress regarding the Navy's plans for procuring DDG- 51s, particularly the Flight III version. Some of these issues were first raised in this CRS report; the GAO report developed these issues at length and added some additional issues. Potential FY2013 issues for Congress concerning destroyer procurement include the following:
whether actions should be taken to mitigate the significant projected shortfall in cruisers and destroyers;
whether to approve the Navy's request for a DDG-51 MYP arrangement beginning in FY2013, and if so, whether it should include Flight III DDG-51s;
whether there is an adequate analytical basis for procuring Flight III DDG-51s in lieu of the previously planned CG(X) cruiser, and whether an analysis of alternatives (AOA) or the equivalent of an AOA should be performed before committing to the development and procurement of Flight III DDG-51s;
whether the Flight III DDG-51 would have sufficient air and missile capability to adequately perform future air and missile defense missions;
cost, schedule, and technical risk in the Flight III DDG-51 program;
whether the Flight III DDG-51 design would have sufficient growth margin for a projected 35- or 40-year service life;
whether the categorization of the Flight III DDG-51 program in the DOD acquisition process provides for a sufficient level of oversight for the program; and
schedule risk for recently procured Flight IIA DDG-51s.
This package includes following files:
| # | File Name | Document Date | Order ID: | Number of Pages | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
RL32109.pdf
|
Mar 16, 2012 | RL32109 | 52 | $29.95 | Add to Cart |
Older Versions:


RL32109.pdf