
today's posted documents
- Biological Opinions for the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta: A Case Law Summary -- Click to view this document
- The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Categorical Eligibility -- Click to view this document
- Border Security: Immigration Enforcement Between Ports of Entry -- Click to view this document
- Terrorist Watch List Screening and Background Checks for Firearms -- Click to view this document
- Transportation, Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies (THUD): FY2013 Appropriations -- Click to view this document
- The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA): An Overview -- Click to view this document
- Instances of Use of United States Armed Forces Abroad, 1798-2013 -- Click to view this document
- Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI) Fund: Programs and Policy Issues -- Click to view this document
- Securing U.S. Diplomatic Facilities and Personnel Abroad: Background and Policy Issues -- Click to view this document
- Syria's Chemical Weapons: Issues for Congress -- Click to view this document
- Nuclear Energy: Overview of Congressional Issues -- Click to view this document
- Terminating Contracts for the Government's Convenience: Answers to Frequently Asked Questions -- Click to view this document
- Selected Agency Budget Justifications for FY2014 -- Click to view this document
- The Enactment of Appropriations Measures During Lame Duck Sessions -- Click to view this document
- Missing Adults: Background, Federal Programs, and Issues for Congress -- Click to view this document
Find documents
Why Certain Trade Agreements Are Approved as Congressional-Executive Agreements Rather Than as Treaties
Trade agreements such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), World Trade Organization (WTO) agreements, and bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs) have been approved by majority vote of each House of Congress rather than by two-thirds vote of the Senate - that is, they have been treated as congressionalexecutive agreements rather than as treaties. The congressional-executive agreement has been the vehicle for implementing Congress' long-standing policy of seeking trade benefits for the United States through reciprocal trade negotiations. In a succession of statutes, Congress has authorized the President to negotiate and enter into tariff and nontariff barrier (NTB) agreements for limited periods, while permitting NTB and free trade agreements (FTAs) negotiated under this authority to enter into force for the United States only if they were approved by both houses in a bill enacted into public law and other statutory conditions were met. The President was granted temporary trade agreement negotiating authority utilizing this approval procedure in the Trade Act of 2002 (P.L. 107-210); the authority expires June 30, 2007. The Dominican Republic- Central America-United States Free Trade Agreement (DR-CAFTA) and an FTA with Bahrain were legislatively approved under Trade Act procedures in 2005. Pursuant to Trade Act notification requirements, the President officially informed Congress on January 6, 2006, of his intent to enter into an FTA with Peru. The Administration is also negotiating other FTAs as well as agreements in the WTO Doha Round under Trade Act authorities. A federal appellate court held in 2001 that the issue of whether the NAFTA should have been approved as a treaty rather than as a congressional-executive agreement was a nonjusticiable political question; the U.S. Supreme Court denied review in the case.
This package includes following files:
| # | File Name | Document Date | Order ID: | Number of Pages | Price | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
97-896_05_31_2006.pdf
|
Jan 17, 2006 | 97-896 | 6 | $19.95 | Add to Cart |
Older Versions:


97-896_05_31_2006.pdf